Re: Seg-fault in format(text)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Seg-fault in format(text)
Date: 2011-05-23 15:36:38
Message-ID: 13683.1306164998@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> It's a stretch that we'd ever support two billion arguments in any form,
> but an explicit check for "arg < 0" would make me feel better.

No objection here, especially since I've just determined that bug #6035
is also some kind of unhandled-overflow problem...

Do you want to take care of this one?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-23 16:53:29 Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-05-23 15:10:51 Re: Seg-fault in format(text)