| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Version checking when loading psql |
| Date: | 2001-11-21 15:12:02 |
| Message-ID: | 13671.1006355522@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
[ redirected from patches to general ]
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Greg Sabino Mullane writes:
>> Attached is a little patch that simply verifies that the
>> version of psql you are running is the same as the version
>> of postgresql you are attaching to.
> I'm sure this would annoy people.
I'm of two minds about it. It'd annoy *me*, but I know we have seen
trouble reports from people who were using version-mismatched psql
and didn't understand why some \d commands didn't work. Maybe we
should be catering more to newbies here.
Any other opinions out there?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-11-21 15:32:06 | Re: [PATCHES] Version checking when loading psql |
| Previous Message | Eric Cholet | 2001-11-21 15:09:52 | Re: Determining which index to create |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-21 15:30:17 | Re: Rejection of the smallest int8 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-21 15:06:09 | Re: Rejection of the smallest int8 |