| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Nearing beta? |
| Date: | 2013-04-14 03:56:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1365911810.20086.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 12:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> We went around on whether we liked this or not, but it seemed to me
> that the discussion came out at the same place Peter had submitted
> to start with. I don't know why he's not committed it, but I have
> no objection to him doing so, as long as it happens PDQ.
Committed and commit fest closed.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2013-04-14 10:53:54 | Re: [PATCH] pg_regress and non-default unix socket path |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-04-14 03:44:38 | Re: PROPOSAL: tracking aggregated numbers from pg_stat_database |