Re: Why does Postgres allow duplicate (FK) constraints

From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why does Postgres allow duplicate (FK) constraints
Date: 2013-03-27 16:23:57
Message-ID: 1364401437.21067.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Alban Hertroys, 26.03.2013 17:17:
>> It can make sense during a maintenance window, if you create a new
>> (redundant) FK constraint concurrently to replace the existing one.
>> If you'd first remove the existing constraint, you're allowing FK
>> violations until the new constraint has finished creating its index.
>>
>> This happens for example if you want to use a different index
>> algorithm, say a gist index instead of a btree index, or if the
>> initial index has gotten corrupt somehow and it needs reindexing.
>
> I can understand this for indexes, but a foreign key constraint does not create
> one.

I once saw a case where this needed to be done because the
dependency information somehow became inconsistent.

--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-27 16:43:05 Re: money with 4 digits after dot
Previous Message Konstantin Izmailov 2013-03-27 16:10:39 money with 4 digits after dot