On 01/09/2013 01:08:39 PM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > I can see arguments to be made for both sides. I'm asking that you
> > think it through to the extent you deem necessary and make
> > changes or not. At that point it should be ready to send
> > to a committer. (I'll re-test first, if you make any changes.)
> Oh my, I have dropped the ball on this one in the worst manner
My fault too. I've been thinking I should write to remind you.
> I actually still prefer to keep the signatures of
> and PLy_get_spi_error_data similar, so I'd opt for keeping the patch
> as-is :)
I will send it on to a committer.
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2013-01-09 19:32:59|
|Subject: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables|
|Previous:||From: email@example.com||Date: 2013-01-09 19:20:35|
|Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs|