Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Date: 2007-02-09 03:15:26
Message-ID: 13565.1170990926@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds.
>>
>> That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.

> CCI is CommandCounterIncrement to me, so let's not use that
> abbreviation.

Agreed. I looked for a bit at adding a separate typedef ComboCommandId
to be used where a cid was definitely a combo cid, but it didn't seem to
be very useful to do that...

I'm testing the patch currently. I was a bit surprised to find the
without_oid test failing, but it makes sense because I'm using a
MAXALIGN=8 machine. I suppose Heikki tested on MAXALIGN=4.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-02-09 03:22:58 patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-09 03:11:18 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2007-02-09 03:22:58 patch adding new regexp functions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-02-09 03:11:18 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch