On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 23:26 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:24:08PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Why was this change made?
>
> I asked Andrew and he had no idea why a 'set -x' would be in the script.
> I ran the script and saw the commands being echoed. Was that
> intentional?
yes
> If so, I can add it back,
please
> but it would be good to add a
> comment as to why it was being used, because Andrew and I had no idea,
> and thought it was a mistake.
Well, it is so you can see what's being run in case you see failures or
odd output. It's usually fairly self-evident what set -x does, but feel
free to comment it.