| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Date: | 2006-01-05 18:59:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1351.1136487558@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The following patch allows VIEW and SEQUENCE for GRANT. I didn't add
> checks for relkind, figuring it wasn't worth it, right?
The permissions for a sequence aren't the same as they are for a table.
We've sort of ignored the point to date, but if we're going to add
special syntax for granting on a sequence, I don't think we should
continue to ignore it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 19:06:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 18:20:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 19:06:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-05 18:20:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT |