Re: kqueue

From: Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: kqueue
Date: 2016-09-20 12:19:38
Message-ID: 134c4fb2-b5e9-7bb3-1c5d-1a2b93a64b86@beccati.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 16/09/2016 05:11, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Still no change measurable on my laptop. Keith, would you be able to
> test this on your rig and see if it sucks any less than the last one?

I've tested kqueue-v6.patch on the Celeron NetBSD machine and numbers
were constantly lower by about 5-10% vs fairly recent HEAD (same as my
last pgbench runs).

Cheers
--
Matteo Beccati

Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/

In response to

  • Re: kqueue at 2016-09-16 03:11:38 from Thomas Munro

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2016-09-20 12:40:34 Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
Previous Message Alex Ignatov 2016-09-20 11:15:45 Re: Parallel sec scan in plpgsql