Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay
Date: 2010-06-28 18:26:19
Message-ID: 1347.1277749579@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... It is even more unreasonable to commit to
> providing a timely patch (twice) and then fail to do so. We are
> trying to finalize a release here, and you've made it clear you think
> this code needs revision before then. I respect your opinion, but not
> your right to make the project release timetable dependent on your own
> schedule, and not your right to shut other people out of working on
> the issues you've raised.

Since nobody has put forward a proposed beta3 release date, I don't feel
that I'm holding anything up. In the meantime, I have many
responsibilities and am facing Red Hat internal deadlines.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-06-28 18:30:24 Propose Beta3 for July
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-06-28 18:23:25 Keepalives win32