Re: splitting htup.h

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: splitting htup.h
Date: 2012-08-29 19:13:11
Message-ID: 1346267383-sup-5826@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Andres Freund's message of mié ago 29 12:10:17 -0400 2012:

> > OK, scratch that thought then. So we seem to be down to choosing a new
> > name for what we're going to take out of htup.h. If you don't like
> > heap.h, maybe something like heap_tuple.h? I'm not terribly excited
> > about it either way though. Any other ideas out there?
> htup_details.h? That doesn't have the sound of "fringe details" that
> htup_private.h has.

htup_details.h seems reasonable, thanks.

Here's the proposed patch (which uses tupheader.h instead of
htup_details.h but other than that it's pretty much what I would
commit).

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
tupbasics-4.patch application/octet-stream 88.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-08-29 19:50:06 splitting *_desc routines
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-08-29 18:14:56 Re: MySQL search query is not executing in Postgres DB