| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-08 19:27:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1341775650.2058.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2012-07-07 at 11:32 -0400, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> But, since you're using operators, what would you think is an
> appropriate name for the file the operator is dumped into?
The name of the operator, just like for any other object. (Assuming
we're using the name of a table for the file for the table etc.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-07-08 19:31:32 | Re: Schema version management |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-07-08 16:25:07 | Re: expression evaluation with expected datatypes |