| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |
| Date: | 2012-06-21 17:17:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1340299036.26286.67.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2012-06-21 at 16:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I don't recall the reason why using 9.2.0betax was actually wrong - i
> realize that's not the name of the version, so thereby the directory
> was wrong. But in what way would it be wrong to call the version that?
It's not the beta for 9.2.0, it's the beta for the 9.2 series. There is
not 9.2.1betaX, after all.
> Given that it would help with sorting.
How does it help? 9.2.0, 9.2.0betaX, 9.2.1, ... ???
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2012-06-21 17:45:46 | Re: Btree or not btree? That is the question |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-06-21 17:15:57 | Re: Release versioning inconsistency |