Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
>> 
>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something*
>> here.

> We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is.
> But I think we should add the (closely related) base backups from
> slave to the list as well - I've had more people say they're really
> going to use that one than the cascading replication. Perhaps add them
> both on the same bullet point?

Sure, reword it however you want.  I've not been paying much attention
to replication stuff, so I don't really know what's important there.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. at 2012-09-03 16:06:29 from Magnus Hagander

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. at 2012-09-03 16:57:52 from Bruce Momjian
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. at 2012-09-04 12:48:06 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2012-09-03 16:16:04
	Subject: Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade
Previous:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2012-09-03 16:06:29
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2012-09-03 16:57:52
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.
Previous:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2012-09-03 16:06:29
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.