Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy
Date: 2012-04-18 21:27:27
Message-ID: 1334784320-sup-7284@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié abr 18 13:05:03 -0300 2012:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > Per bug #6593, REASSIGN OWNED fails when the affected role owns an
> > extension.  This would be trivial to fix if extensions had support code
> > for ALTER EXTENSION / OWNER, but they don't.  So the only back-patchable
> > fix right now seems to be to throw an error on REASSIGN OWNED when the
> > user owns an extension.  (If anyone wants to claim that we ought to work
> > on a real fix that allows changing the owner internally from REASSIGN
> > OWNED, without introducing ALTER EXTENSION support for doing so, let me
> > know and I'll see about it.)
>
> I would be OK with the latter.

Here's a patch for that.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment Content-Type Size
reassign-extension.patch application/octet-stream 4.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-04-18 22:00:57 Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy
Previous Message Alex 2012-04-18 21:13:17 Re: libpq URI and regression testing