| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-13 20:48:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1334350086.9019.16.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2012-04-11 at 23:30 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Now what would be sort of neat is if we had a way to keep all the
> versions of patch X plus author and reviewer information, links to
> reviews and discussion, etc. in some sort of centralized place.
Well, a properly linked email thread contains all this. I have seen a
couple of anti-patterns evolving, though, including patch authors
starting a new email thread for each patch version, and reviewers
starting a new email thread for each review. When that happens, the
existence of the commitfest app makes things worse, in a way. (Of
course, any discussion here about bug trackers emphasizes the need for
email to be the primary communications method for this very reason.)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-04-13 20:50:48 | Re: Last gasp |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2012-04-13 20:38:09 | Re: Patch: add timing of buffer I/O requests |