| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Last gasp |
| Date: | 2012-04-13 12:55:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1334321748.9019.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2012-04-12 at 10:12 -0500, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Well actually, the other advantage of using branches is that it would
> encourage committers to bounce a patch back to the submitter for
> modification *instead of* doing it themselves. This would both have
> the advantage of saving time for the committer, and doing a better job
> of teaching submitters how to craft patches which don't need to be
> modified.
I don't see how using branches changes that. You could (or should) be
doing that already anyway.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-13 13:51:27 | Re: Memory usage during sorting |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-04-13 12:16:18 | Re: not null validation option in contrib/file_fdw |