Re: Last gasp

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Last gasp
Date: 2012-04-11 15:00:39
Message-ID: 1334156238-sup-9033@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of mié abr 11 11:35:10 -0300 2012:

> For example, Thom (and others) could collect a number of typo fixes in
> their own repo and then just ask for a merge.The advantage over just
> staging multiple commits and then submitting a patch would be that
> multiple people could work on it...

The other advantage is that committers could have that tree as another
remote in their main PG tree, and so changesets could be pulled into the
same clone and cherry-picked into the master branch.

(I'd also set up a clone for Alex Hunsaker to commit to pl/perl).

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

  • Re: Last gasp at 2012-04-12 22:02:37 from Martijn van Oosterhout

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-04-11 15:06:48 Re: [HACKERS] [streaming replication] 9.1.3 streaming replication bug ?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-04-11 14:56:15 Re: Last gasp