Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Date: 1999-03-15 15:27:52
Message-ID: 13325.921511672@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, I assume this has all been corrected, right?

The recv() problem is fixed, and Jan took a swipe at reducing the cost
of palloc/pfree. I have not done a profile since Jan's changes to see
how successful he was.

I would like to revisit memory management at some point, but it won't
happen for 6.5.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-03-15 15:31:04 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-03-15 15:25:25 Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails