Re: renaming domain constraint

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: renaming domain constraint
Date: 2012-03-21 14:57:53
Message-ID: 1332341821-sup-5573@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 21 11:43:17 -0300 2012:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Here is a patch for being able to rename constraints of domains.  It
> > goes on top of the previously committed patch for renaming table
> > constraints.
>
> I don't like the way you've modified get_constraint_oid(), which is
> currently parallel to many other get_whatever_oid() functions and with
> this patch, would no longer be. There seems to be little point in
> shoehorning the new functionality into the existing function anyway,
> considering that you've conditionalized basically every piece of logic
> in the function. I think you should just invent a completely separate
> function and be done with it.

get_relation_constraint_oid() plus get_domain_constraint_oid()?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-21 14:58:40 Re: misleading error message from connectMaintenanceDatabase()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-03-21 14:57:15 Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema