Re: pg_upgrade + streaming replication ?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Henk Bronk <hb(at)101-factory(dot)eu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Lonni J Friedman <netllama(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade + streaming replication ?
Date: 2012-03-21 01:27:40
Message-ID: 1332293260.20746.99.camel@sussancws0025
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 22:21 +0100, Henk Bronk wrote:
> actually rsync works fine on file level and is good for manual syncing.
> it check really the files with the stat command, so a bit change will trigger the copy
> in practice you need to keep an eye on compleetness of the rsync action.

Rsync still needs to examine the entire file. It has no information to
know that the file is the same on master and slave.

We could try to give it the appropriate information on which it can make
that assumption -- e.g. keep the timestamps the same so that rsync
assumes the contents are the same. But that seems fragile and I don't
see a good way of doing it, anyway.

We need a way to take a base backup of just the catalogs, essentially,
and leave the user data intact. Probably quite a few details to sort out
though.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Kerr 2012-03-21 01:40:36 Re: huge price database question..
Previous Message Jim Green 2012-03-21 01:16:07 Re: huge price database question..