Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Artur Litwinowicz <admin(at)ybka(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database
Date: 2012-03-07 14:26:25
Message-ID: 1331130344-sup-2744@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié mar 07 05:15:03 -0300 2012:

> We talked about this at last year's Dev meeting. And we got
> sidetracked into "what we really want is stored procedures". Maybe we
> want that, but its a completely separate thing. Please lets not get
> distracted from a very simple thing because of the existence of other
> requirements.

Completely agreed.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2012-03-07 14:33:22 Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-03-07 14:24:37 Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)