| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
| Date: | 2012-03-02 02:44:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1330656096-sup-1201@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I've cleaned up the backend code a bit -- see attached. More yet to go
through; I'm mainly sending it out for you (and everyone, really) to
give your opinion on my changes so far.
(I split out the plpgsql checker for the time being into a separate
branch; I'll get on it after I get this part committed.)
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| check_function-core-2012-03-01-1.diff | application/octet-stream | 54.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-02 03:52:22 | Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-03-02 02:13:29 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |