| From: | Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Windows version of PostgreSQL 8.x? |
| Date: | 2005-07-12 17:15:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1326.193.217.136.104.1121188538.squirrel@www.havleik.no |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:29, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
>> How stable is the Windows version of PGSQL 8? Is it as stable as the
>> Linux
>> version or should I be looking for something else?
>
> For certain values of stable, yes, it is.
>
> However, if for no other reason than the fact the the port is fairly
> new, I wouldn't run it in production myself just yet. If you have no
> choice but to run Windows where you are, then I'd say PostgreSQL is
> about as stable as most other databases running on Windows.
>
Well, I have an uncle that is still using Windows NT and I don't think
that I can persuade him to change to Linux, sadly...
I am writing him a small app, that need a reliable database that can
handle some data and is fast...
BTW, is PGSQL 8 supported on Windows NT 4?
BTJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ted Slate | 2005-07-12 17:16:44 | To Postgres or not |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-07-12 17:11:45 | Re: Update more than one table |