Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ben Hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Date: 2011-12-07 20:56:02
Message-ID: 1323291362.27491.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-12-06 at 15:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> TBH, I think that inventing a new datestyle setting "ECMA" would be a
> more appropriate investment of effort.

So we'd have a setting called "ECMA" that's really ISO, and a setting
called "ISO" that's really SQL, and a setting called "SQL" that's really
Postgres, and a setting called "Postgres" that's also Postgres but
different.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ben hockey 2011-12-07 21:11:37 Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-12-07 20:43:06 Re: documentation issue - extensions