Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-18 16:20:32
Message-ID: 13220.1284826832@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

I wrote:
> This commit occurred during that interval between where we'd initially
> branched 7.3 and where we moved it up to head. I think what happened
> was that I tried to back-patch a fix into what was then the 7.3 branch,
> and when Marc moved the branch point, these commits all ended up
> orphans. So indeed there's no harm discarding them. (I always
> suspected that what Marc had done wasn't entirely kosher, and yup,
> now the chickens are coming home to roost.)

BTW, if you're wondering why there was only one such commit, it's
because we decided to not maintain the branch only a day after Marc had
sprouted it. See discussion here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-09/msg01733.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-09-18 16:21:53 Re: psycopg and two phase commit
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-18 16:10:06 Re: Progress indication prototype

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-19 02:07:46 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-18 01:29:15 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion