Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-18 01:48:41
Message-ID: 13207.1047952121@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> * Backend's ReadyForQuery message (Z message) should carry an indication
>> of current transaction status (idle/in transaction/in aborted transaction)
>> so that frontend need not guess at state. Perhaps also indicate
>> autocommit status.

> If we do this, could we get rid of the messy autocommit GUC option and
> handle autocommit in the client?

Hmm ... that's a thought ... not very backwards-compatible with 7.3,
but I think I like it better than continuing on with the GUC option.
As you say, that path is looking messier all the time.

Comments anyone?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-18 01:54:17 Re: please apply patch to current CVS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-18 01:48:34 Beta scheduled for June 1

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-03-18 03:40:18 Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-18 00:40:39 Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign