TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time)
Date: 2000-12-15 19:56:48
Message-ID: 13183.976910208@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?

Still broken. Hiroshi had muttered something about fixing the internal
commit of VACUUM so that it's more like a real commit --- including
advancing the transaction ID --- but still doesn't release the exclusive
lock held by VACUUM. Basically we need to propagate the locks forward
to the new xact instead of releasing them. I think that would be a nice
clean solution if we could do it. Do you have any ideas about how?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-12-15 20:07:46 Re: Idea for reducing planning time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-12-15 19:45:14 Re: Idea for reducing planning time