Re: Announcing Veil

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com>
Cc: veil-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Announcing Veil
Date: 2005-10-05 02:51:55
Message-ID: 13172.1128480715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc Munro <marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com> writes:
> Since I was unable to dynamically assign a LWLock using
> LWLockAssign (none available), I have fairly arbitrarily overloaded the
> use of existing LWLocks. When the flames die down perhaps we can
> discuss making a small number (one would be enough for me) of LWLocks
> available.

Perhaps you missed the comment in NumLWLocks()?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-10-05 04:00:00 prefix btree implementation
Previous Message Marc Munro 2005-10-05 02:22:55 Announcing Veil