Re: WAL configuration and REINDEX

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: adey <adey11(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, garcia_josval(at)gva(dot)es, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jose Alarcon" <alarcon_jos(at)gva(dot)es>
Subject: Re: WAL configuration and REINDEX
Date: 2006-09-24 23:32:23
Message-ID: 13160.1159140743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

adey <adey11(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I apologise if I am uninformed, but it is my understanding that REINDEX is
> still required even with the most regular of vacuums?

REINDEX shouldn't be required at all under normal circumstances.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-09-25 00:18:06 Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL
Previous Message adey 2006-09-24 22:23:09 Re: WAL configuration and REINDEX