Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Date: 2011-09-06 06:20:02
Message-ID: 1315290002.29771.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-09-05 at 16:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > > Good. Is it possible to compile with debug symbols, -g? Odd you are
> > > crashing in libc.
> >
> > this had debug:
> >
> > ./configure \
> > --prefix=/opt/pgsql-9.0.5a-int \
> > --enable-debug \
> > --disable-rpath \
> > --without-perl \
> > --without-python \
> > --without-tcl \
> > --without-openssl \
> > --without-pam \
> > --without-krb5 \
> > --without-gssapi \
> > --enable-nls \
> > --enable-integer-datetimes \
> > --enable-thread-safety \
> > --with-libxml \
> > --with-libxslt \
> > --without-ldap
>
> --enable-debug adds internal debug calls, not compiler debug symbols.

No, you have that backwards.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Torsten Zühlsdorff 2011-09-06 07:25:28 Re: Query runs in 335ms; function in 100,239ms : date problem?
Previous Message Venkat Balaji 2011-09-06 05:50:34 Re: warm standby - apply wal archives

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-06 07:29:34 Re: Large C files
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-09-06 05:13:42 pg-json