Re: Backup's from standby

From: senthilnathan <senthilnathan(dot)t(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Backup's from standby
Date: 2011-08-17 05:39:02
Message-ID: 1313559542811-4706899.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks for your reply.,

@ Robert.,

What issue we may face if you take a backups(includes data dir + wal files)
at standby without LVM snapshot?

-Senthil

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Backup-s-from-standby-tp4688344p4706899.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2011-08-17 06:54:38 Re: A note about hash-based catcache invalidations
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-08-17 05:13:50 Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, avoid dumping orphaned temporary tables. This ma