| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kohei Kaigai <kohei(dot)kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Common object property boards |
| Date: | 2011-08-08 16:22:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1312820469-sup-9000@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun ago 08 12:05:05 -0400 2011:
> We could do that, but what the heck is the point? What benefit are
> we trying to get by not returning a pointer to the structure? I feel
> like we're making this ludicrously complicated with no real
> justification of why all of this complexity is adding any value.
I don't see that it's complicated in any way. Seems pretty simple to me.
The justification is simple too: don't export struct definitions without
need.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-08-08 16:27:17 | Re: Compiler warnings with stringRelOpts (was WIP: Fast GiST index build) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-08 16:20:14 | Re: psql document fix about showing FDW options |