Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended
Date: 2011-07-29 14:41:47
Message-ID: 1311950209-sup-9538@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Excerpts from Dave Page's message of vie jul 29 10:13:50 -0400 2011:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> >> /postgres-9.1/share/doc/html/manage-ag-overview.html
> >> In the folowing partagrasoh 'recommendable' should be 'recommended'.
> >
> > Seems perfectly ok as-is to me ...
>
> Sounds hideous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
> Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
>
> If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
> that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
> recommend storing them in separate databases.

Except that we don't use the first person in docs, do we?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2011-07-29 14:45:01 Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-07-29 14:13:50 Re: postgres-9.1beta3 typo: recommendable --> recommended