Re: Idea for reducing planning time

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea for reducing planning time
Date: 2000-12-15 19:45:14
Message-ID: 13110.976909514@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
>> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
>> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...

> Posting patch is only useful if you want people to review it. They are
> more likely to if you send it to patches, already diff'ed. In fact, how
> do you pull out a patch set from CVS? You have to use -D and specify a
> date/time range, right?

That's a good point --- there doesn't seem to be any real easy way of
extracting a set of changes to different files except to use -D. And
even that doesn't do anything to separate unrelated patches applied at
about the same time.

For the record, you can get a diff of this kind with a command like

cvs diff -c -D '2000-12-14 17:00' -D '2000-12-14 18:00'

executed in the top level of the tree you want to search.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-15 19:56:48 TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing planning time)
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-12-15 19:33:26 RE: Idea for reducing planning time