From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Erwin Brandstetter <brandstetter(at)falter(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions |
Date: | 2011-07-07 21:40:49 |
Message-ID: | 1310074850.2046.9.camel@laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:08 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> On 07.07.2011 08:52, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 21:22 +0200, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
> >> Aloha!
> >>
> >> I have been observing irregularities in the function statistics for some time. Now I have investigated and believe to have found the cause.
> >> Everything is here, including a proposed fix:
> >> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/325
> >>
> > The fix you propose requires from us to write a patch for PostgreSQL
> > (which won't be available to users before 9.2) for something we can
> > already do right into pgAdmin. Instead of filtering with the name of the
> > schema and the function, we should use its OID. This way, we could fix
> > 1.12, and 1.14 really quickly.
>
> Yeah, that's even better. Makes the query simpler, too.
> I was unsure whether funcid was known at the time of the query.
>
Fixed.
> I do wonder, however, why the function arguments, part of the function signature, would not be included in pg_catalog.pg_stat_user_functions.
> Would you think this is worthy of a suggestion to the postgres people?
>
Might be. They could reply that you already have this information from
the pg_proc catalog.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2011-07-07 21:41:12 | Re: [pgAdmin III] #325: Wrong statistics for overloaded functions |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-07-07 21:39:39 | pgAdmin III commit: Fix display of a function's statistics |