| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| Date: | 2011-06-30 20:00:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1309464003.19274.15.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
<snip>
> I don't think we have a policy for this, but I have done it for some
> time now and nobody has complained, so I sort of assumed it was okay.
> Besides, some of the people pouring the money in does care about it;
> moreover, it provides a little incentive for other companies that
> might also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer
> approval" of the idea, or a final little push.
>
> So what's the general opinion here?
+1 for adding sponsor name to the commit message. It will encourage
companies more.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-06-30 22:19:09 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the visibility map crash-safe. |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-06-30 19:55:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-06-30 20:42:26 | Re: hint bit cache v6 |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-06-30 19:55:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |