Re: dynamic shared memory and locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Date: 2014-01-22 17:11:55
Message-ID: 13094.1390410715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Shouldn't we introduce a typedef LWLock* LWLockid; or something to avoid
> breaking external code using lwlocks?

+1, in fact there's probably no reason to touch most *internal* code using
that type name either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-01-22 17:23:02 Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-22 17:10:30 Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors