Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Radek Strnad <radek(dot)strnad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Date: 2008-07-02 16:55:42
Message-ID: 13084.1215017742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Why does a collation have a schema?

Because the SQL spec says so. Also, if we don't put them in schemas,
we have no nice way to distinguish built-in and user-defined collations,
which creates a problem for pg_dump.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-07-02 17:02:36 Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-02 16:52:47 Re: WIP patch: reducing overhead for repeat de-TOASTing