Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?
Date: 2011-06-15 20:14:28
Message-ID: 1308168833-sup-3188@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 11:54:25 -0400 2011:
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
>
> > Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a
> > ConstraintAttributeSpec to the second block, because that would
> > enforce an order to these options.
>
> > OTOH adding NOT VALID to ConstraintAttributeSpec is a bit invasive,
> > since it's used in quite a few places, including CREATE TABLE, where
> > NOT VALID is never allowed.
>
> I think we need to do the second one, ie, add it to
> ConstraintAttributeSpec and do what's necessary to filter later.
> The reason we have a problem here is exactly that somebody took
> shortcuts.
>
> It'd probably be sufficient to have one or two places in
> parse_utilcmds.c know which variants of Constraint actually support
> NOT VALID, and throw an error for the rest.

So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2011-06-15 20:20:59 Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-06-15 20:13:59 flexible array members