Re: procpid?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: procpid?
Date: 2011-06-15 16:07:29
Message-ID: 1308153986-sup-8093@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié jun 15 08:47:58 -0400 2011:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> > Putting on my stability hat instead of my "make it right" one, maybe this
> > really makes sense to expose as a view with a whole new name.  Make this new
> > one pg_activity (there's no stats here anyway), keep the old one around as
> > pg_stat_activity for a few releases until everyone has converted to the new
> > one.
>
> Now, that's a suggestion I could very possibly get behind. Though the
> fact that it would leave us with pg_activity / pg_stat_replication
> seems less than ideal. Maybe pg_activity isn't the best name
> either... bikeshedding time!

pg_sessions?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-06-15 16:10:51 Re: Small SSI issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-15 15:54:25 Re: FK NOT VALID can't be deferrable?