| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED |
| Date: | 2011-06-13 22:00:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1308002372-sup-29@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun jun 13 09:57:50 -0400 2011:
> Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> "can't reassign objects owned by %s because this user is internal to
> >> the database system" ?
>
> > that message is not that clear... it seems to imply i can't reassign
> > any object from that user...
>
> I think s/drop/reassign ownership of/ is sufficient. There's no reason
> to change the rest of the message, especially because the same
> phraseology is in use elsewhere.
Fixed in 8.2 and up.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-13 22:08:12 | Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-06-13 21:44:05 | ITYM DROP TABLE |