Re: procpid?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: procpid?
Date: 2011-06-12 09:48:35
Message-ID: 1307872115.15056.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2011-06-11 at 16:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Uh, I am the first one I remember complaining about this so I don't
> see why we should break compatibility for such a low-level problem.

I complain about it every day to the wall. :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message richhguard-monotone 2011-06-12 11:26:16 PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-12 04:21:38 Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix