Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Encodings and docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Encodings and docs
Date: 2005-01-15 23:46:47
Message-ID: 13057.1105832807@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is this open item complete?
> 	* synchonize supported encodings and docs

Seems to be.  As far as I can tell from looking in the archives, the
question came up when we added WIN1250 to the set of allowed server
encodings.  But it is now shown in both tables in section 20.2, so
I think we are set.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stuart BishopDate: 2005-01-16 06:30:11
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4
Previous:From: Tommi MäkitaloDate: 2005-01-15 23:22:07
Subject: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group