Re: Encodings and docs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Encodings and docs
Date: 2005-01-15 23:46:47
Message-ID: 13057.1105832807@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is this open item complete?
> * synchonize supported encodings and docs

Seems to be. As far as I can tell from looking in the archives, the
question came up when we added WIN1250 to the set of allowed server
encodings. But it is now shown in both tables in section 20.2, so
I think we are set.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stuart Bishop 2005-01-16 06:30:11 Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 4
Previous Message Tommi Mäkitalo 2005-01-15 23:22:07 Re: sparse (static analyzer) report