| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | many contrib links are broken |
| Date: | 2011-05-06 19:07:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1304708829.28821.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The commit 159e3d86292cfec2a2828f9f69ac7a6cb1be242d created some funny
business out of many links to contrib modules. Take a look at this
page:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/log-shipping-alternative.html
It now reads: "See the Section F.31 module for a reference
implementation of this." (where it previously said "the pg_standby
module") There are many other places like that now.
I don't think the toolchain changed in this area, so the whole change
was broken to begin with. The idea is sound, IMO, but the
implementation needs to be reevaluated.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Kupershmidt | 2011-05-06 23:23:24 | Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-06 18:30:04 | Re: should pg_basebackup be listed as a server application? |