| From: | Gilberto Castillo Martínez <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-03 18:14:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1304446486.24100.4.camel@gilbertoc.mtcorp.etecsa.cu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
El mar, 03-05-2011 a las 12:46 -0500, Joshua Berkus escribió:
> All,
>
> This has come up a couple times off-list, so I thought we should hammer it out here regarding messaging for 9.1.
"in-memory tables" song good.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
Edificio Beijing. Miramar Trade Center. Etecsa.
Miramar, La Habana.Cuba.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/plain | 179 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Kramer | 2011-05-03 18:28:27 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-03 18:10:42 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-03 18:24:19 | Re: SIREAD lock versus ACCESS EXCLUSIVE lock |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-03 18:10:42 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |