Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This time around, please do not remove API functions just because you
>> can't find a reference to them in the core code. I would like to see
>> a posted, discussed patch first.

> OK, here is my match to mark items as static or not used:
> ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/static

By and large, this just demonstrates the silliness of using an automated
tool for this purpose :-(. The hits in gist and gin might be valid ---
Teodor would need to comment on that --- but almost every one of the
others is a "no, don't do that". As an example, you've successfully
reverted this recent patch in toto:

2006-04-26 20:46 tgl

* src/: backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c, include/utils/selfuncs.h: If
we're going to expose VariableStatData for contrib modules to use,
then we should export a reasonable set of the supporting routines
too.

The fundamental problem with find_static is that it hasn't got a clue
about likely future changes, nor about what we think external add-ons
might want ...

regards, tom lane