| From: | Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Liam Stewart <liams(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DatabaseMetaData |
| Date: | 2001-08-13 20:28:34 |
| Message-ID: | 12dgntcoa27mu0q8sd4bcpub8ge69m1mn5@4ax.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:07:59 -0400, you wrote:
>Ok, I see what you're looking at. However, the book states the escapes
>should only be supported when the underlying DBMS supports them and that
>escape syntaxes must be included for stored procedures etc where
>appropriate. Does PostgreSQL support stored procedures using a stored
>procedures escape syntax? If yes, we should return yes, if no, we should
>return no until that functionality is added. Both cases are allowed,
>AFAICS. The book doesn't mention that drivers should always return true
>for this procedure.
You're right.
>"Java 2 EE Specification, v1.2"
Ah, I see, this is one of the subbooks in my book. Well, I think
we'll have to check for J2EE conformance as well, since I guess
the driver will be used on J2EE platforms more and more.
Regards,
René Pijlman
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-08-13 20:38:48 | Re: [PATCHES] JDBC Array Support, Take III |
| Previous Message | Greg Zoller | 2001-08-13 20:16:27 | JDBC Array Support, Take III |