Re: Collations versus user-defined functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Collations versus user-defined functions
Date: 2011-03-12 20:23:33
Message-ID: 1299961413.21000.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2011-03-12 at 12:17 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does the SQL standard have anything to say on the matter, or is there
> a precedent in the behavior of TSQL or other DBMSes?

I had investigated this issue but the SQL standard doesn't say anything
about it.

The SQL inlining issue is tricky. Other languages including PL/pgSQL
are not supported at the moment.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2011-03-12 20:26:24 Re: template0 database comment
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-03-12 20:10:21 Re: template0 database comment